Barriers … what barriers?

 

Here’s a timely guest post from Matt MacDonald, Community Links PLUS Manager for Sustrans Scotland, one of our supporting organisations. Matt knows more than most what might prevent councils from putting in ambitious schemes for active travel – and how they might be overcome. 

 

My five year old daughter learnt to cycle recently in our local park. Thanks to the wonders of a balance bike it took her about an hour to learn. She loved it. The freedom, the rush of air on her face, daddy slowly disappearing behind her as she laughs maniacally. I wanted to capitalise on this, and start riding with her to places we need to go, to shops, friends’ homes, to her nursery. However, I couldn’t, because doing so would require riding on roads I myself ride, and knowing some of the close encounters that I’ve had, I couldn’t bring myself to take the risk.

Good segregated infrastructure would enable us to build a life skill that will serve my daughter for the rest of her life. We’re starting to see infrastructure of this kind in Scotland, slowly but surely, there is still a lot more that needs to be done.

Given what I’ve just said, I’m privileged to manage a design competition called Community Links PLUS for Sustrans Scotland. Community Links PLUS seeks big, game-changing infrastructure projects that recalibrate streets in favour of people on foot and on bike.

The concept is simple but powerful; reallocate road space and create places that work for people. The proposals are multi-year, multi-million pound projects in densely populated areas, with all the complications that they can bring.

The competition finds us moving away from the old fashioned view of delivering off road networks* to understanding that people want to walk and cycle safely on the majority of streets.

For example, the first winner of the competition, the South City Way, is an incredible project by Glasgow City Council. The South City Way will offer over 3km of Copenhagen style terraced segregation from Queens Park in Glasgow’s Southside, right into the heart of the city.

I’ve gathered together a few insights into the elements required to successfully deliver public realm infrastructure projects, and I hope that in sharing them it enables you to identify and support projects in your own area.

I’d like to tell a short story that highlights the biggest determining factor in successful delivery of cycling and walking projects. A couple of my colleagues recently went on a research trip to Copenhagen. I wasn’t even remotely jealous as I knew they’d come back with precious insights, honest! And they did. Whilst there, they met with the team from Gehl Architects. Jan Gehl is the man credited with much of the public realm improvements in Copenhagen that have helped shape it into the thriving city that it now is. My colleagues were taken to the busiest, most desirable shopping street, Stroeget, photo below.

Stroeget as it is now

I’m sure you agree, it’s pretty amazing. Who wouldn’t want to spend time there, meeting friends, letting children play, shopping, eating out? But let me show you how it used to look:

Stroeget as it was in the past

Not so pleasant. Truthfully, quite cool, looking like a scene from an Orson Welles movie, but not somewhere you’d want to hang around too long, and certainly not somewhere children could cycle or walk around without parents desperately holding onto their hands. When it was closed as a temporary street trial, in 1962, it caused outrage in the media and amongst the general public. So what led it to become the chic street you see in the first image? Strong political support! There was cross-party and cross-political term support for change. The lesson is to support, involve and be nice to your Councillors, and for that matter MSPs and MPs. Involve them, empower them with knowledge, invite them to see the issues. Don’t just fling pelters on social media!

Despite the optimistic title, there are obviously barriers, but I want to focus on how we overcome them, so what are they?

Funding: in these times of austerity local authority’s budgets are being constrained. Seek sources of funding, and share them with your local authority officers, offering to help write bids for funding. Our own Community Links and Community Links PLUS funding streams offer 50% of project costs but the local authorities must find the rest. When successful projects are delivered and the benefits seen, more local authority funding will be allocated for similar projects, as Edinburgh have demonstrated over the last decade.

Resourcing: this is linked to funding in that teams delivering cycling and walking projects are being stretched. Seek out the teams in local authorities delivering these projects and offer support, as they are your allies. As with politicians, don’t get stuck into them on social media. Constructive campaigning is far better, offering evidence of benefits and community support is far more likely to open doors than being relentlessly negative.

Misconceptions: if there is one thing that the Sustrans Scotland team have learnt from infrastructure delivery, it’s that community engagement goes a long way in dealing with issues before they arise. Good engagement that goes beyond statutory consultation requires a lot of time and effort. Do your bit to support it, go and knock on doors or deliver leaflets, help identify venues, turn up at events and proactively engage with the people that turn up. The earlier engagement happens, the better. Ideally projects should be co-designed with the community, by clearly setting objectives and working on interventions that achieve those objectives, e.g. increased footfall for businesses, safer streets, streets that allow better movement of people on foot and on bike.

Divisive labels: avoid letting a project be pigeonholed as either cycling or walking, or people as cyclists or pedestrians. We are delivering projects for people, creating safer, more attractive streets that are better for businesses and the community as a whole.

Finally, remember that you can’t please everyone. Avoid the vocal minority that often refuse to see the bigger picture and that fear change. Instead focus your efforts on those receptive to change for the good of the majority. Emotions can often run high when people’s views are challenged, but we must stay calm, be well informed, and bring people with us.

It is people that create change, be they politicians, local authority officers, business owners, or residents. It is only by everyone working together, as a team, that we can create places and spaces that work for everyone. I’m confident that if we do, in ten years’ time my daughter will be cycling to high school on infrastructure that our friends in Copenhagen will be visiting on study tours!

*Off road networks are still great by the way